State (0)
County (1)
Place (2)
Qualified Census Tract 2025 (3)
Opportunity Zone (4)
Difficult to Develop Area 2025 (5)
Properties (6)
Investment pathway (7)
| Focus on Tipping Points |
| Focus on Preservation |
| Focus on Entry |
| Focus on Places |
| Focus on Bargains |
Opportunity rank (8)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Health outlook rank (9)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Grocery store access rank (10)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Low life expectancy rank (11)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Percent of occupied units built before 1960 rank (12)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Superfund proximity rank (13)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Physician access rank (14)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Labor market access rank (15)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Jobs access rank (16)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Labor force participation rank (17)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Unemployment rate rank (18)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Percent of population aged 25 or older with high school degree or greater rank (19)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Percent of workers with a commute under 30 minutes via any transit rank (20)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Educational opportunity rank (21)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Student teacher ratio rank (22)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
SAT/ACT engagement rank (23)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Preschool enrollment rank (24)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
School proficiency rank (25)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Internet access rank (26)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Transit access rank (27)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Public transit enagement rank (28)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Average commuting time rank (29)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Walkability rank (30)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Percent of households with a car rank (31)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Transit stop access rank (32)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Neighborhood desirability rank (33)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Percent of households earning $200,000 or more rank (34)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Personal crime rank (35)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Median housing value rank (36)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Poverty rate rank (37)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Vacancy rate rank (38)
| Very High |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very Low |
Neighborhood trajectory (39)
| Outpacing |
| On Par or Just Behind |
| Lagging behind |
Trajectory of percent of households earning above $200,000 relative to the region (40)
| Outpacing |
| On Par or Just Behind |
| Lagging behind |
Trajectory of the poverty rate relative to the region (41)
| Outpacing |
| On Par or Just Behind |
| Lagging behind |
Trajectory of vacancy rate relative to region (42)
| Outpacing |
| On Par or Just Behind |
| Lagging behind |
Trajectory of personal crime index relative to region (43)
| Outpacing |
| On Par or Just Behind |
| Lagging behind |
Trajectory of median housing value relative to region (44)
| Outpacing |
| On Par or Just Behind |
| Lagging behind |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or better opportunity rank (45)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or better health outlook rank (46)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher food access rank (47)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher building age rank (48)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher physician access rank (49)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher life expectancy rank (50)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher superfund proximity rank (51)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher labor market access rank (52)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher job access rank (53)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher labor force participation rank (54)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher unemployment rate rank (55)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher population over 25 with a high school degree rank (56)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher commute rank (57)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher transit access rank (58)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher public transit use rank (59)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher commuting time rank (60)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher walkability rank (61)
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher vehicle availability rank (62)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher transit stop rank (63)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher educational opportunity rank (64)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher student teacher ratio rank (65)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher SAT/ACT completion rate rank (66)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher school proficiency rank (67)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher preschool enrollment rank (68)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher internet access rank (69)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-49.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher neighborhood desirability rank (70)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher percent of households earning more than $200,000 rank (71)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher personal crime rank (72)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher median housing value rank (73)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher poverty rate rank (74)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with typical or higher vacancy rate rank (75)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with populations earning above $200,000 outpacing the region (76)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with vacancy rates outpacing the region (77)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with median housing values outpacing the region (78)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with personal crime index values outpacing the region (79)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39% |
| 40%-59% |
| 60%-79% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with poverty rates outpacing the region (80)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of federally assisted homes in areas with neighborhood trajectory outpacing the region (81)
| Less than 20% |
| 20%-39.9% |
| 40%-59.9% |
| 60%-79.9% |
| 80% or more |
|