ArcGIS REST Services Directory Login | Get Token
Home > services > Maps > Opportunity_Map (MapServer) > Legend Help | API Reference
JSON

Legend (Maps/Opportunity_Map)

Properties (0)
State (1)
CBSA (2)
County (3)
Place (4)
Difficult to develop area 2020 (5)
Qualified census tract 2020 (6)
Opportunity zone (7)
Opportunity capital rank (8)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Educational opportunity rank (9)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Transit access rank (10)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Labor market access rank (11)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Health outlook rank (12)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Neighborhood desirability rank (13)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Neighborhood trajectory (14)
Outpacing Outpacing
On par or just behind On par or just behind
Lagging behind Lagging behind
Neighborhood desirability change (15)
Increased Increased
Remained the same Remained the same
Decreased Decreased
Investment pathway (16)
Focus on tipping points Focus on tipping points
Focus on preservation Focus on preservation
Focus on entry Focus on entry
Focus on places Focus on places
Focus on bargains Focus on bargains
Cancer risk rank (17)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Chance of low food access rank (18)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Percent of homes built before 1960 rank (19)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Proximity risk management plan site rank (20)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Access to primary care provider rank (21)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Percent of commuters with less than 30 minute commute (22)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Local job density rank (23)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Labor market engagement rank (24)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Labor force participation rate rank (25)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Unemployment rate rank (26)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Percent of adults with a high school degree or greater rank (27)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
School performance rank (28)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Student teacher ratio rank (29)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Percent of students taking SAT or ACT rank (30)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Percent of 3 to 4 year olds enrolled in school rank (31)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Percent of workers commuting via public transit (32)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Average commuting time rank (33)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Distance to CBSA centroid rank (34)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Percent of households with a vehicle rank (35)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Percent of households earning $200,000 or more rank (36)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Personal crime index rank (37)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Median housing value rank (38)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Percent of population earning below poverty rank (39)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Vacancy rate rank (40)
Very high Very high
High High
Typical Typical
Low Low
Very low Very low
Relative change in vacant homes (41)
Outpacing Outpacing
On par or just behind On par or just behind
Lagging behind Lagging behind
Relative change in number of households earning $200,000 or more (42)
Outpacing Outpacing
On par or just behind On par or just behind
Lagging behind Lagging behind
Relative change in population earning below poverty (43)
Outpacing Outpacing
On par or just behind On par or just behind
Lagging behind Lagging behind
Relative change in personal crime index (44)
Outpacing Outpacing
On par or just behind On par or just behind
Lagging behind Lagging behind
Relative change in median housing value (45)
Outpacing Outpacing
On par or just behind On par or just behind
Lagging behind Lagging behind
Investment pathway (46)
Focus on tipping points Focus on tipping points
Focus on preservation Focus on preservation
Focus on places Focus on places
Focus on entry Focus on entry
Focus on bargains Focus on bargains
Percent change in the number of renter occupied renter households (47)
Decrease of 25% or more Decrease of 25% or more
Decrease of 5% - 24.9% Decrease of 5% - 24.9%
Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9% Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9%
Increase of 5% - 24.9% Increase of 5% - 24.9%
Increase of 25% or more Increase of 25% or more
Percent change in the population 62 or older (48)
Decrease of 25% or more Decrease of 25% or more
Decrease of 5% - 24.9% Decrease of 5% - 24.9%
Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9% Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9%
Increase of 5% - 24.9% Increase of 5% - 24.9%
Increase of 25% or more Increase of 25% or more
Percent change in population under 18 (49)
Decrease of 25% or more Decrease of 25% or more
Decrease of 5% - 24.9% Decrease of 5% - 24.9%
Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9% Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9%
Increase of 5% - 24.9% Increase of 5% - 24.9%
Increase of 25% or more Increase of 25% or more
Percent change in median gross rent (50)
Decrease of 25% or more Decrease of 25% or more
Decrease of 5% - 24.9% Decrease of 5% - 24.9%
Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9% Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9%
Increase of 5% - 24.9% Increase of 5% - 24.9%
Increase of 25% or more Increase of 25% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical opportunity capital (51)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical labor market access rank (52)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical educational opportunity (53)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical transit access (54)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical health outlook (55)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical neighborhood desirability (56)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with neighborhood desirability trajectory (57)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with neighborhood desirability change is increasing (58)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which cancer risk rank is typical or below typical (59)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which chance low food access rank is typical or below typical (60)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of homes built before 1960 rank is typical or below typical (61)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which proximity to risk management plan sites rank is typical or below typical (62)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which primary care doctors per person rank is typical or above typical (63)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of workers with less than a 30 minute commute rank is typical or above typical (64)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which job density rank is typical or above typical (65)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which labor market engagement rank is typical or above typical (66)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which labor force participation rate rank is typical or above typical (67)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which unemployment rate rank is typical or below typical (68)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of adults with a high school degree or greater rank is typical or above typical (69)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of workers commuting via public transportation rank is typical or above typical (70)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which average commuting time rank is typical or below typical (71)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which distance to CBSA centroid rank is typical or below typical (72)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of households with a vehicle available rank is typical or above typical (73)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which school performance index rank is typical or above typical (74)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which student teacher ratio rank is typical or below typical (75)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of students in 11th and 12th grade that took the SAT or ACT rank is typical or below typical (76)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of 3 and 4 year olds enrolled in school rank is typical or above typical (77)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of households earning $200,000 or more rank is typical or above typical (78)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which personal crime index rank is typical or above typical (79)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which median housing value rank is typical or above typical (80)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of population earning below poverty rank is typical or below typical (81)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which vacancy rate rank is typical or below typical (82)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the number of households earning $200,000 or more is outpacing the region (83)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the population earning below poverty is lagging behind the region (84)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the vacant homes is lagging behind the region (85)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the personal crime index is lagging behind the region (86)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the median housing value is outpacing the region (87)
Less than 20% Less than 20%
20% - 39.9% 20% - 39.9%
40% - 59.9% 40% - 59.9%
60% - 79.9% 60% - 79.9%
80% or more 80% or more