Properties (0)
State (1)
CBSA (2)
County (3)
Place (4)
Difficult to develop area 2020 (5)
Qualified census tract 2020 (6)
Opportunity zone (7)
Opportunity capital rank (8)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Educational opportunity rank (9)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Transit access rank (10)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Labor market access rank (11)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Health outlook rank (12)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Neighborhood desirability rank (13)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Neighborhood trajectory (14)
| Outpacing |
| On par or just behind |
| Lagging behind |
Neighborhood desirability change (15)
| Increased |
| Remained the same |
| Decreased |
Investment pathway (16)
| Focus on tipping points |
| Focus on preservation |
| Focus on entry |
| Focus on places |
| Focus on bargains |
Cancer risk rank (17)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Chance of low food access rank (18)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Percent of homes built before 1960 rank (19)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Proximity risk management plan site rank (20)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Access to primary care provider rank (21)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Percent of commuters with less than 30 minute commute (22)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Local job density rank (23)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Labor market engagement rank (24)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Labor force participation rate rank (25)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Unemployment rate rank (26)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Percent of adults with a high school degree or greater rank (27)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
School performance rank (28)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Student teacher ratio rank (29)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Percent of students taking SAT or ACT rank (30)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Percent of 3 to 4 year olds enrolled in school rank (31)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Percent of workers commuting via public transit (32)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Average commuting time rank (33)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Distance to CBSA centroid rank (34)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Percent of households with a vehicle rank (35)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Percent of households earning $200,000 or more rank (36)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Personal crime index rank (37)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Median housing value rank (38)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Percent of population earning below poverty rank (39)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Vacancy rate rank (40)
| Very high |
| High |
| Typical |
| Low |
| Very low |
Relative change in vacant homes (41)
| Outpacing |
| On par or just behind |
| Lagging behind |
Relative change in number of households earning $200,000 or more (42)
| Outpacing |
| On par or just behind |
| Lagging behind |
Relative change in population earning below poverty (43)
| Outpacing |
| On par or just behind |
| Lagging behind |
Relative change in personal crime index (44)
| Outpacing |
| On par or just behind |
| Lagging behind |
Relative change in median housing value (45)
| Outpacing |
| On par or just behind |
| Lagging behind |
Investment pathway (46)
| Focus on tipping points |
| Focus on preservation |
| Focus on places |
| Focus on entry |
| Focus on bargains |
Percent change in the number of renter occupied renter households (47)
| Decrease of 25% or more |
| Decrease of 5% - 24.9% |
| Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9% |
| Increase of 5% - 24.9% |
| Increase of 25% or more |
Percent change in the population 62 or older (48)
| Decrease of 25% or more |
| Decrease of 5% - 24.9% |
| Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9% |
| Increase of 5% - 24.9% |
| Increase of 25% or more |
Percent change in population under 18 (49)
| Decrease of 25% or more |
| Decrease of 5% - 24.9% |
| Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9% |
| Increase of 5% - 24.9% |
| Increase of 25% or more |
Percent change in median gross rent (50)
| Decrease of 25% or more |
| Decrease of 5% - 24.9% |
| Increase of 4.9% - decrease of 4.9% |
| Increase of 5% - 24.9% |
| Increase of 25% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical opportunity capital (51)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical labor market access rank (52)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical educational opportunity (53)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical transit access (54)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical health outlook (55)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with typical or above typical neighborhood desirability (56)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with neighborhood desirability trajectory (57)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods with neighborhood desirability change is increasing (58)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which cancer risk rank is typical or below typical (59)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which chance low food access rank is typical or below typical (60)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of homes built before 1960 rank is typical or below typical (61)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which proximity to risk management plan sites rank is typical or below typical (62)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which primary care doctors per person rank is typical or above typical (63)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of workers with less than a 30 minute commute rank is typical or above typical (64)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which job density rank is typical or above typical (65)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which labor market engagement rank is typical or above typical (66)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which labor force participation rate rank is typical or above typical (67)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which unemployment rate rank is typical or below typical (68)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of adults with a high school degree or greater rank is typical or above typical (69)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of workers commuting via public transportation rank is typical or above typical (70)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which average commuting time rank is typical or below typical (71)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which distance to CBSA centroid rank is typical or below typical (72)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of households with a vehicle available rank is typical or above typical (73)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which school performance index rank is typical or above typical (74)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which student teacher ratio rank is typical or below typical (75)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of students in 11th and 12th grade that took the SAT or ACT rank is typical or below typical (76)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of 3 and 4 year olds enrolled in school rank is typical or above typical (77)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of households earning $200,000 or more rank is typical or above typical (78)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which personal crime index rank is typical or above typical (79)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which median housing value rank is typical or above typical (80)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which percent of population earning below poverty rank is typical or below typical (81)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which vacancy rate rank is typical or below typical (82)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the number of households earning $200,000 or more is outpacing the region (83)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the population earning below poverty is lagging behind the region (84)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the vacant homes is lagging behind the region (85)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the personal crime index is lagging behind the region (86)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
Percent of assisted units in neighborhoods which the change in the median housing value is outpacing the region (87)
| Less than 20% |
| 20% - 39.9% |
| 40% - 59.9% |
| 60% - 79.9% |
| 80% or more |
|